News
Jan 7, 2026
Insights
Enterprise
Artificial Intelligence
Global
NewDecoded
4 min read
McKinsey's November 2025 survey of nearly 2,000 executives across 105 countries paints a paradoxical picture. While 88% of organizations now use AI in at least one business function (up from 78% last year), two-thirds remain stuck in experimentation or pilot phases. Only about one-third have begun scaling AI across their enterprises, with larger companies leading the charge. Nearly half of organizations with over $5 billion in revenue have reached scaling phase, compared to just 29% of smaller firms. The financial impact tells an even starker story. Just 39% of respondents attribute any EBIT impact to AI, and most report less than 5% of earnings tied to AI use. However, qualitative benefits appear more widespread, with 64% citing innovation improvements and nearly half reporting better customer satisfaction.
Agentic AI systems capable of autonomous multi-step workflows represent the next frontier, with 62% of organizations experimenting with or scaling agents. Yet deployment remains narrow: only 23% are scaling agents anywhere in their enterprise, typically in just one or two functions. IT and knowledge management lead adoption, while technology, media, telecommunications, and healthcare sectors show strongest uptake. Gartner predicts 40% of enterprise applications will integrate task-specific AI agents by end of 2026.
Only 6% of organizations qualify as AI high performers (those seeing 5%+ EBIT impact). These outliers share distinct characteristics: they're three times more likely to fundamentally redesign workflows rather than overlay AI on existing processes. They pursue transformation over efficiency, with 80% setting growth or innovation objectives alongside cost reduction. High performers demonstrate three times stronger senior leadership commitment and deploy AI across more functions. Perhaps surprisingly, they report more negative AI consequences, reflecting their more ambitious mission-critical deployments and heightened monitoring.
While actual workforce reductions remain modest (17% median reporting decreases in the past year), expectations diverge sharply. Looking ahead, 32% of companies anticipate reducing total workforce by 3% or more within 12 months, while 13% expect increases of similar magnitude. This marks a crucial shift from theoretical concern to concrete planning reality. Goldman Sachs Research estimates 6-7% of the US workforce could face displacement if AI sees wide adoption, though new job creation may offset losses. Organizations continue hiring for AI-specific roles, with software engineers and data engineers most in demand, suggesting workforce redistribution rather than blanket elimination.
Decoded
McKinsey's findings arrive as multiple 2025 reports from Wharton, ISG, and Anthropic confirm a consistent pattern: AI adoption has crossed the chasm into mainstream acceptance, but value capture remains concentrated among a small group of sophisticated implementers. The gap between adoption rates (88%) and those achieving meaningful financial returns (6%) reveals AI's current position in the classic technology hype cycle. Organizations have successfully moved past the "should we adopt AI?" question to confront a harder challenge: transforming pilots into scaled operations that move enterprise metrics. The workforce data particularly matters: expectations of job cuts now outpace job growth expectations 2-to-1, suggesting business leaders have shifted from viewing AI job displacement as hypothetical to treating it as an operational planning assumption. Combined with emerging agent capabilities and platforms from Microsoft, Salesforce, and others, 2026 likely represents the year when AI's labor market impact transitions from statistical noise to measurable signal. For enterprises, the message is clear: competitive advantage now derives not from adopting AI tools, but from the organizational discipline to redesign workflows, secure leadership commitment, and scale with appropriate governance.